2nd August 2011

Good morning everyone,

Today I want to advise you of a situation that developed yesterday regarding the review of The Sprint Lay Expert, which is one of Chris Castell’s systems.

Many of you will have seen the comment posted yesterday by Gary Williams, but for those that may not, here is what he said.

“I have a copy of the sprint lay expert, so i can check all the results as they come up, and i have lost count how many times i have had to correct Chris, the lastest mistake is 29.07.2011 thirsk 3.30 burj hatta this is not a selection, the race was a 3 year old + which is not a qualifier, all in all i think this season i have corrected him on 8 or 9 occasions, which is a lot of money, the mistake will always go in christophers favour, never the other way round.”
Regards
Gary
Naturally we were concerned and contacted the Author Chris Castell.
He advised us that the problem lies, not with him, or his software, but is in fact due to errors on the Sporting Life website.
Chris’s software “scrapes” information from the Sporting Life website, if that information is incorrect, then there is a possibility that incorrect selections may be made.
Now lets deal with Gary’s comments.
” i have lost count how many times i have had to correct Chris, the lastest mistake is 29.07.2011 thirsk 3.30 burj hatta this is not a selection” “all in all i think this season i have corrected him on 8 or 9 occasions”

This as I have explained was due an error on behalf of the Sporting Life website. Gary also has problems counting, as he has lost count after just the second error since the review started.
” the mistake will always go in christophers favour, never the other way round.”

Not true, the last and only other time an error was highlighted, Chris took the decision to remove the results from his website, even though it was a winning bet and subscribers would have been on it.
We here at BST are in agreement with Chris Castell who says that as all selections will have been given to subscribers, who would have put their money on them, if there is the odd mistake, then he will be leaving them on the results records, as members will have placed the bets.
Moving onto this morning, and I received another communique from Gary, this time sent to our helpdesk. It went like this.
“Sent you a email yesterday, about this joke outfit sprint lay expert, and yet still you publish fake results….
July 29th Thirsk 3.30pm BURJ HATTA was not a qualifier, because selections must be in a 2yo and 3yo race, and thirsk 3.30pm was a 3yo+.
your as bad as chris castelle, iv exposed him on the betfair forum/horse racing, and now im going to do the same to you.
why cant anyone be honest anymore, call yourself betting system truths…your a joke…”

OK, so now let me share with you some interesting things that have come to light about our “friend” Gary, who speaks so strongly about honesty!
It would appear that if he does indeed have a copy of the Sprint Lay Experts manual, then it is an illegal copy, as there is, according to the author, Chris Castell, no record that Gary has actually bought it!!
There is also a strong suspicion that Gary and another person are actively selling the Sprint Lay Experts on Ebay!
Chris Castell is seriously considering taking legal action.
So, in summary, in our opinion, Gary Williams is a liar and cheat, and is nothing but a trouble maker. If ever you are offered anything from him, we suggest you avoid it like the plague.
As you are all aware, we have reviewed all of Chris Castell’s systems, and whilst they may not have set the world on fire, yet, Chris has always been willing to stand up and be counted, and we respect that.
We do not however, have any time for someone who “steals” a product, and possibly attempts to sell it, and then has the audacity, to come on here and start insulting the integrity, not only of Chris Castell, but of us here at BST!!
Seems to us that Gary wouldnt know “honesty” if he fell over it!!
I just wanted to bring this situation to your attention this morning, and I thank you for taking the time to read this post.
Regards,
Gordon